  | 
                     
                    
                      | Singapore  scored 83 out of a possible 100 on the 2023 Corruption Perceptions Index, the  same result it achieved for the 2022 index. | 
                     
 
                  Global anti-graft watchdog places Singapore as 5th least corrupt country  in world index 
                     
                    SINGAPORE (The Straits Times/ANN) -- Global  anti-graft watchdog Transparency International has ranked Singapore as the  fifth least corrupt country in the world, with a score that also places the  Republic as the least corrupt country in Asia. 
                    Singapore scored 83 out of a  possible 100 on the group’s 2023 Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI), on a scale  with zero for highly corrupt and 100 for very clean. The Republic achieved the  same result in 2022. 
                    The highest score it recorded  was 87 in 2012, when the metric was revamped by Transparency International. 
                    The CPI surveys experts and  business people, and scores 180 countries and territories on a scale of 0 to  100 by their perceived levels of public-sector corruption. 
                    Denmark (with a score of 90)  topped the overall 2023 index, maintaining its position for the sixth  consecutive year, and is followed by Finland (87), New Zealand (85) and Norway  (84). 
                    Transparency International,  which released its report on January 30, said two in three jurisdictions scored  below 50 in 2023. 
                    It noted that corruption levels  had improved in only 28 jurisdictions, and worsened in 34 countries and  territories, despite progress in criminalising corruption and establishing  specialised anti-corruption institutions around the world. 
  “This limited progress is hardly  surprising, considering the chronic weaknesses of justice systems meant to  detect, investigate, prosecute and adjudicate corruption cases,” said the  anti-graft organisation. 
                    The top-scoring region was  Western Europe and the European Union, but Transparency International noted  that its average score – 65 out of 100 – had dropped for the first time in a  decade. 
                    Among the 31 countries assessed  in the region, only six had improved scores, while eight showed declines. 
                    Several high-ranking  democracies, including Sweden (82), the Netherlands (79), Iceland (72) and  Britain (71), recorded their lowest-ever scores in the index, with Britain experiencing an overall six-point decrease  over the past five years. 
                    Transparency International said the region’s “robust  anti-corruption measures continue to be undermined by the weakening of checks  and balances” and that the “erosion of political integrity contributes to  diminishing public trust in countries’ ability to tackle the region’s ongoing  challenges”. 
                    The top five territories in the Asia-Pacific region  were New Zealand, Singapore, Australia (75), Hong Kong (75) and Japan (73). 
                    Transparency International said the latest index  reveals another year of little to no meaningful progress towards curbing  corruption in the Asia-Pacific region. 
  “For five years in a row, the average CPI score for  the region stagnates stubbornly at 45 out of a possible 100. 
  “Very few countries show sustained turnarounds that  indicate significant changes in corruption levels,” said the group of the  Asia-Pacific. 
                    Singapore saw a number of corruption probes in 2023,  including the case involving former transport minister S. Iswaran, 61, who was arrested on July 11. 
                    Iswaran, who has since resigned,  was handed 27 charges on January 18, 2024, including two for corruption. The  case against him is ongoing. 
                    Ms Urantsetseg Ulziikhuu, Asian  regional coordinator at Transparency International, said any impact from  Iswaran’s case would more likely be seen in the medium term, rather than the  short term. 
  “Independence of institutions,  institutional checks and balances, and enforcement of existing laws, among  others, would contribute to the level of perceived corruption in Singapore, and  perception changes slowly over time,” she added. 
                    Noting that Singapore is among  the countries with high scores, Ms Urantsetseg said: “A country with a high  score is not necessarily corruption-free. 
  “The CPI pays attention to the  ability of governments to contain corruption and enforce effective integrity  mechanisms in the public sector, which would include effective criminal  prosecution for corrupt officials.” 
                    The Corrupt Practices  Investigation Bureau (CPIB) said the corruption situation in Singapore remains  firmly under control. 
                    It added that domestically, the  number of public sector corruption cases remains consistently low and public  perception surveys regularly conducted by the Bureau indicate strong public  confidence in national corruption control efforts. 
  “In the World Justice Project  Rule of Law Index 2023, Singapore was ranked third for absence of corruption, the top Asian  nation out of 142 countries. 
  “The Political and Economic Risk  Consultancy ranked Singapore as the least corrupt country in its 2023 Report on  Corruption in Asia out of 16 economies, a position we have held since 1995,”  said CPIB, adding that the latest CPI showed Singapore remains the only Asian  country ranked in the top 10. 
                    Mr Wilson Ang, partner and head  of the Asia regulatory compliance and investigations practice at law firm  Norton Rose Fulbright, said Singapore has retained its ranking and score due to  its robust anti-corruption regime established over many years. 
                    He added: “However, no country  can afford to be complacent and Singapore has taken a strong line, as  demonstrated by recent prosecutions and enforcement actions. 
  “We can expect that Singapore  will continue to strengthen its compliance position for corporates and  scrutinise senior management who set the tone at the top. In due course, we may  see legislation to protect whistleblowers.” 
 
     
 
                  (Latest Update January 31, 2024)
  |